Name a strategy for answering logical reasoning questions effectively.

Name a strategy for answering logical reasoning questions effectively.

• A. Read the questions before the passage
• B. Break down the argument into premises and conclusions to assess its validity
• C. Answer based on gut feeling
• D. Ignore ambiguous terms

Answer: (B)

Breaking down the argument into premises and conclusions is a highly effective strategy for answering logical reasoning questions. This method allows you to analyze the structure of the argument critically, which is essential for assessing its validity. By identifying the main conclusion and the supporting premises, you can better understand how the argument is constructed and whether the reasoning holds up under scrutiny. This process involves looking for key phrases that indicate the conclusion, such as "therefore," "thus," or "consequently," and distinguishing them from the premises, which often contain evidence or reasons supporting the conclusion. This clarity helps in evaluating the argument's strength, determining if there are logical fallacies or if the premises logically lead to the conclusion. Understanding the argument in this way equips you with the necessary context to answer questions related to the argument effectively, whether they ask about the strength of the argument, flaws in reasoning, or assumptions made by the author. This analytical approach is much more reliable than relying on instinct or personal feelings, making it a preferred method among those preparing for logical reasoning assessments.

Breaking down the argument into premises and conclusions is a highly effective strategy for answering logical reasoning questions. This method allows you to analyze the structure of the argument critically, which is essential for assessing its validity. By identifying the main conclusion and the supporting premises, you can better understand how the argument is constructed and whether the reasoning holds up under scrutiny.

This process involves looking for key phrases that indicate the conclusion, such as "therefore," "thus," or "consequently," and distinguishing them from the premises, which often contain evidence or reasons supporting the conclusion. This clarity helps in evaluating the argument's strength, determining if there are logical fallacies or if the premises logically lead to the conclusion.

Understanding the argument in this way equips you with the necessary context to answer questions related to the argument effectively, whether they ask about the strength of the argument, flaws in reasoning, or assumptions made by the author. This analytical approach is much more reliable than relying on instinct or personal feelings, making it a preferred method among those preparing for logical reasoning assessments.